October 6, 2026

The tables examined covered report counts, inflows, outflows, undetermined transactions, corporate remittances and investment-related transactions. Buenaventura explained the exclusion of the erroneous BPI amount and removal of duplicate joint-account reports.

Buenaventura read the letter describing a system bug and requesting deletion of 13 covered-transaction reports. He later recalled receiving the request on April 8 and said AMLC had validated and granted the correction.

The witness read paragraph 28, which conditionally compared the corrected manager’s-check total of about P2.11 million with the earlier P2.334 billion amount.

On redirect, Buenaventura read three entries giving no underlying legal or trade obligation, purpose or economic justification as the reporting reason. Their remittance entries and reported counterparty addresses were examined.

Buenaventura identified this report among the material submitted in response to the court’s subpoena when senators asked about investigation status.

The witness identified this report in the submitted material while declining to disclose further actions outside the subpoenaed records.

The submitted reports formed part of the spouses’ transaction tabulation, including the BPI entries examined for correction and the distinction between reported transactions and bank balances.

The witness identified the submitted STRs; cross-examination examined their reported grounds involving flood control, shabu importation and malversation, while senators examined report counts and dates.

Pangilinan examined the ownership history through 2024 and the replacement of Carpio by Pikimong in the 2025 filing. Divinagracia discussed the share-transfer records and the continuing SALN business-interest disclosure.

Pangilinan examined the ownership history through 2024 and the replacement of Carpio by Pikimong in the 2025 filing. Divinagracia discussed the share-transfer records and the continuing SALN business-interest disclosure.

Tulfo contrasted Cale88’s reported inflows with financial-statement losses he cited for 2022 through 2024. Buenaventura said he had no personal knowledge of those statements.

Tulfo contrasted Cale88’s reported inflows with financial-statement losses he cited for 2022 through 2024. Buenaventura said he had no personal knowledge of those statements.

Divinagracia said statements were attached to BIR annual returns although the 2024 and 2025 statements were absent from SEC filings. Tulfo cited losses through 2024 and a small 2025 profit.

Escudero used successive annual declarations in hypothetical comparisons with reported transactions, acknowledging that adding annual SALNs was inappropriate. Erwin Tulfo cited zero cash declarations for 2019 through 2025. The linked collection contains 2007–2012 and 2016–2024 statements; it does not contain the 2025 SALN.

Counsel cited Cale88 in the 2025 business-interest disclosure, and senators used the 2025 statement in their cash and annual-declaration comparisons.

Sumatra identified the debit-and-credit movements for Duterte’s single payroll account at the branch and her signature on the 21-page record.

Sumatra identified over-the-counter withdrawal records and explained that withdrawals at other branches bore certifications from those branches.

Sumatra clarified that the second transaction-document category included on-us check deposits, deposit slips and images of checks.

Sumatra identified her certification that the 20 corporations listed in it had no account at the San Pedro branch.

Sumatra initially named an outstanding-balance certificate but could not find it among the documents shown. Alih said it had not been submitted by that bank and ended the line of questioning.

Dela Cerna identified Carpio’s active account and gave the balances at each year end: P505,517.35, P953,681.42, P115,824.20 and P1,358,373.07 respectively.

Luistro announced receipt of the BIR summary for the forthcoming witness. After Sison identified the wrong email address, the chair directed a copy to her and she confirmed receiving the document.

In adopting the abbreviated bank-record procedure, Escudero distinguished the decision’s treatment of custody of private documents from the direct institutional production and safeguarded records before the court.