Counsel displayed and read the resolution declaring GenCorp the single calculated responsive bidder for a food and catering framework agreement and recommending an award.
← Timed transcript
Research record
September 29, 2026
Procurement and charging documents identified in court, with public availability and transcript context.
Related Documents
Read and verify
An exact document is linked only when a public or privacy-cleared copy is available. Specifically identified unavailable documents remain listed without a substitute download. Transcript citations remain with each record.
Davao City BAC Resolution No. 11061, series of 2025 — prosecution exhibit P-II-6-29
Procurement resolution
Not available in the Senate document archive.Undated Davao City–GenCorp purchase order with April–June 2023 delivery period
Purchase order
Not available in the Senate document archive.One of four transactions distinguished from the earlier PhilGEPS summary after the mayor produced city records; counsel requested exhibit marking of the mayor-supplied documents.
Davao City–GenCorp purchase order for January–March 2024
Purchase order
Not available in the Senate document archive.One of four transactions distinguished from the earlier PhilGEPS summary after the mayor produced city records; counsel requested exhibit marking of the mayor-supplied documents.
Davao City–GenCorp purchase order for April–June 2026
Purchase order
Not available in the Senate document archive.One of four transactions distinguished from the earlier PhilGEPS summary after the mayor produced city records; counsel requested exhibit marking of the mayor-supplied documents.
Davao City–GenCorp purchase order for July–September 2026
Purchase order
Not available in the Senate document archive.One of four transactions distinguished from the earlier PhilGEPS summary after the mayor produced city records; counsel requested exhibit marking of the mayor-supplied documents.
Articles of Impeachment — Article II
Charging document
Open source ↗The prosecution connected the mayor's proposed testimony to Article II; the chair later pressed counsel to connect the examination to the article at hand.