October 1, 2026

The prosecution invoked the allegation of undisclosed properties; the defense disputed the specificity of the real-property allegations.

Referenced in the comparison of deferred-installment acquisition descriptions for the Samal property.

Referenced in the comparison of deferred-installment acquisition descriptions for the Samal property.

Shown on cross-examination for the spouse entry describing San Isidro and a 2013 acquisition at P4,041,000.

Shown and compared with the Samal title; the spouse entry described Matanos and acquisition in 2013.

Shown on cross-examination in both property comparisons, including the Davao land assessed value and Samal assessed-value comparison.

Displayed on direct examination in the Davao and Samal property comparisons. The courtroom year is preserved; the archived SALN index ends with 2024, so that extract is not substituted.

Referenced in the senator-judge discussion of installment acquisition descriptions for the Samal property.

Baldonado produced and read the active title; the discussion concerned the registered owner, location, area and mortgage annotation.

The witness read the P6 million consideration and clarified the deed date; the parties compared it with the SALN acquisition cost.

Baldonado produced the property-tax clearance, transfer-tax receipt and certification, land and building tax declarations, e-CAR and canceled predecessor title. These specific title attachments were furnished for the testimony.

The defense confronted Baldonado with newer declarations bearing the title number, market values and assessed values; the court allowed the comparison despite prosecution objections.

Pineda read the active title; the defense stipulated to its area, location and registered-owner wording.

The deed and its P3,453,849 consideration were compared with SALN acquisition years, costs and location descriptions.

Pineda read the certification on the registry copy; on cross-examination the defense compared an assessed value of P346,960 with the 2024 SALN.

The prosecution enumerated summaries covering transaction reports, 15 juridical persons, Duterte and Carpio transactions, Cale88 inward remittances, and insurance/investment transactions. The defense later described the 11-page cover-letter-and-summaries submission, its strictly confidential markings and reservation of confidentiality; preparation time was granted. These are the October 1 summaries, not the older archived AMLC intelligence-report packet.

Both parties quoted the earlier subpoena ruling while disputing its effect on confidentiality objections. The exact passage is recorded on physical page 40 (printed page 38) of the verified journal.

The chair identified Sections 9(c) and 14(d) of RA 9160 as amended by RA 11521, specifically Section 8-A, for senator-judge consideration before resumption. The exact circulated handout has not been matched.

Sen. Panfilo M. Lacson asked fellow senator-judges to include Section 2 of Republic Act No. 1405 in their weekend research. He said it provides an impeachment exception and that the Supreme Court recognizes that statutory exception.