Working DraftImpeachment Trial of Vice President Sara Duterte
← September 28, 2026 transcript

Audio overview

September 28, 2026

A source-linked English overview of the September 28 impeachment trial sitting.

00:03:29
Running time
Two voices
AI narration
Source-linked
Check the script

Source-linked script

Read while you listen

Click any cited timestamp to cue the original Senate video. The neighboring turn ID opens the reviewed transcript in full context.

01

Host 1 — Introduction

This is Working Draft's audio overview of the Impeachment Trial of Vice President Sara Duterte for September 28, 2026. This is a working reference, not an official Senate record. Today, two records witnesses took the stand, while a dispute over bank documents remained before the court.

04

Host 2 — What PhilGEPS showed

PhilGEPS official Rendell Sopeña discussed an extract presented as 49 GenCorp award entries. He confirmed 15 entries awarded by Davao City and 33 by PhilHealth Region Eleven. When counsel described the last as awarded by OWWA, Sopeña corrected him: it was awarded to OWWA by a procuring entity. These were procurement-system entries, not his firsthand account of each award.

06

Host 2 — The next witness

After Sopeña was excused, Police Major Joericson Sangalang of the PNP Firearms and Explosives Office testified. He said its records showed 22 firearms registered to the Vice President and 29 to her spouse, Atty. Manases Carpio. The defense objected to testimony about Carpio's firearms.

07

Host 1 — What the figures mean

Sangalang gave current market-survey totals of two million, one hundred eighty-four thousand, five hundred fifty pesos for the Vice President's list, and five million, thirty-five thousand, eight hundred twenty pesos for Carpio's. These were current market-survey figures, not the documented acquisition prices of those firearms.

08

Host 2 — Questions from the bench

Senator-Judge Sherwin Gatchalian pressed that distinction. Sangalang said the system-generated certification did not list each gun's production year, making the actual present value hard to establish from the list alone. The presiding officer also questioned what the estimated values showed against declared assets.

09

Host 1 — Competing positions

The prosecution argued the firearms should be individually declared under the asset-statement guidelines it cited. Defense counsel Carlo Narvasa challenged the witness's appraisal ability and argued that current survey amounts could not establish acquisition cost. The court heard those competing positions; the testimony itself did not settle them.

10

Host 2 — Court directions

After limited defense stipulations, the presiding officer allowed Sangalang to testify on the remaining offered purposes. Later, he directed subpoenas for two Davao City Register of Deeds officials and the executive director of the Anti-Money Laundering Council Secretariat for dates later that week.

12

Host 2 — Closing

Each substantive point in this overview links to the reviewed transcript and the official Senate video. This has been the September 28, 2026 audio overview.